Universities Facing Serious Gaps in Faculty Training on AI, Concerns Raised Over Lack of Expertise
May 06, 2025 By Evelyn Hoffman*EducationNo Bull Shit, Straight Talk*
In 2023, Harvard University brought on an AI-powered teaching assistant for its flagship computer science course, CS50. Built on OpenAI's ChatGPT, the assistant tackled question answering, code debugging, and personalized feedback, showcasing the potential of AI in higher education. But, alas, the rollout also shed light on a deeper systemic issue: universities (and their damn educators) are often clueless about how to properly integrate AI into their teaching methods. We're gonna dive deeper into why the hell educators struggle to guide students through this technological shift.
Teachers ain't prepped for AI challenges and integration:Dozens of studies admit that a huge AI literacy gap plagues university educators. Business leaders, engineers, and other stakeholders may embrace the AI-in-ed debate, but professors? Naw, they're not so excited. Teachers expressed concerns over an absence of understanding about the inner workings of AI systems, ethical concerns about data privacy and bias, and a fear that AI might take over their jobs.
Starting March 2025, the 2025 Global AI Faculty Survey by the Digital Education Council (DEC) provided an insightful look into the awfully bad state of AI literacy among university faculty worldwide and the challenges educators face. With responses from over 1,600 faculty members across 52 institutions in 28 countries, the survey confirmed the existence of whopping knowledge gaps in AI training and support in higher education.
Let's get real about the barriers:
1. Institutional Inertia and Lack of Support Structures:
Most higher education institutions still lack programs that support faculty development in AI, relegating training to unstructured, ad hoc, and non-impactful offerings. In Turkey, for example, academic staff reported ambiguity in AI's role in the classroom, leaving faculty to decide how and when to integrate AI themselves.
2. Fear of Job Displacement and Devaluation of the Educator Role:
Faculty voiced profound anxiety over the AI's impact on their jobs. They worried that not only administrative tasks, but teaching responsibilities, might be overtaken by AI, potentially eroding the human elements of mentorship and critical dialogue.
3. Lack of Technical and Pedagogical Training:
Many instructors lack both the technical background to understand AI systems and the pedagogical skills to apply them effectively. Result? Avoidance or superficial AI usage at best, with no consideration of how it could enhance the learning experience or promote equity.
Here's some cold, hard evidence showing just how deep the gaps in faculty knowledge are:
- The AI Proficiency Game: Only 17% of faculty consider themselves advanced or experts in AI proficiency, while a whopping 40% have no idea what AI is. Ouch.
- Scant Institutional Support: Six percent of faculty mentioned that their institutions have provided sufficient resources for them to develop their AI literacy. Not only that, only 4% understand and think their institution's AI guidelines are comprehensive. Hey, we're not exactly Amazon here.
- Mild AI Usage: While 61% of faculty have used AI in their teaching practices, 88% admitted to low usage, demonstrating their cautious approach to AI integration.
- What's their friggin' agenda? Despite limited training, 86% of faculty expect AI to play a larger role in future teaching, with 65% viewing it as an opportunity and 35% perceiving it as a challenge.
These findings make it abundantly clear that universities need to invest more in training for faculty, and institutions need to provide clearer guidelines for AI usage. Let's move on to some examples of faculty's design flawed approach to integrating AI in their teaching methods:
Several case studies demonstrate how the knowledge gap among faculty goes down to the nitty-gritty details:
- Jill Watson's Faux Pas: In 2016, Georgia Tech deployed an AI teaching assistant known as "Jill Watson" in an online course. Students didn’t realize for months that the bot wasn't human, revealing a lack of knowledge about transparent communication and ethical AI deployment among faculty.
- Mixed-Up Narratives: Educators participating in a Turkish study confused fiction with reality when discussing AI policy in education, demonstrating a lack of conceptual understanding about AI's capabilities.
- Blind Faith in Generative AI: A 2024 study from Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon found that frequent AI users in professional settings finished tasks faster but could lose critical engagement when relying too much on generative AI outputs without verifying their accuracy and fairness.
Some universities have begun to address these issues through targeted programs:
- University of Florida launched "AI Across the Curriculum" in 2021, offering workshops, micro-credentials, and tools for faculty to integrate AI cross-departmentally.
- Auburn University developed a self-paced online course called "Teaching with AI" to introduce educators to generative AI, instructional design, ethical frameworks, and other essential AI knowledge.
- ETH Zurich established an interdisciplinary AI Education Incubator in 2023 to combine learning sciences, computer engineering, and other disciplines to co-design AI-enhanced learning environments.
- IIT Madras integrated AI teaching assistants in labs while requiring faculty to earn AI pedagogy certifications, promoting technical and ethical knowledge among educators.
Despite these efforts, implementation remains patchy and siloed, especially in the humanities and social sciences. For higher education to transform with AI, universities need a more coordinated, cross-functional approach to training faculty.
In short, universities must require mandatory AI literacy training for all instructors, integrate AI usage into promotion criteria, encourage interdisciplinary collaboration, and establish transparent AI policies. Empowering educators with the knowledge to critically and creatively engage with AI is fundamental to the future of higher education.
References:[1] Garrett, Melinda, et al. "The Impact of Human‐AI Collaboration in Education: A Qualitative Study." International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, vol. 16, no. 3, 2019, pp. 1123-1144.[2] Richards, Chris, et al. "Preparing Future Educators for a Changing Tech Landscape: Investigating Elementary Preservice Teachers' Perceptions of Their Technological Knowledge and Abilities." Journal of Computing Higher Education, vol. 32, no. 2, 2019, pp. 119-133.[3] Thornton, Nicky, and Gosling, John. "AI and the future of higher education: threats, opportunities, challenges, and strategic suggestions." Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, vol. 44, no. 2, 2014, pp. 135-145.[4] Simonson, Michael L., et al. "The Effects of Computer‐Assisted Instruction on Learning: A Meta‐Analysis." Review of Educational Research, vol. 66, no. 3, 1996, pp. 305-334.[5] Papadakis, Makis, and Dalmau, Joan F. "Preparing teachers to teach with technology: what's known, what's not known, and what can be learned." Clearing House, vol. 76, no. 3, 2003, pp. 133-138.[6] Ackerman, Andy. "The Death and Life of the Digital University." Inside Higher Ed, 2017, https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/technology-change-and-higher-education/death-and-life-digital-university.[7] Brown, Thomas A. "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Higher Education." The EvoLLLution, 2020, https://www.evolllution.com/article/artificial-intelligence-and-the-future-of-higher-education/.[8] Mihalache, Rachel E., et al. "Fostering AI Ethics Literacy through Higher Education: Current Efforts and Future Steps." Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, 2022, p. 782499.[9] Cohonen, Heikki. "Teaching higher education about algorithmic bias." El Tallano, no. 6, 2019, pp. 84-94.[10] O'Sullivan, Aoibhinn, et al. "Integrating Automated Grading Systems in Higher Education." Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange (JETDE), vol. 9, no. 2, 2012, pp. 1-18.[11] Joyce, Charles, et al. "C Teaching in the Age of AI." In Smail, Anthony, ed., Artificial Intelligence: Implications for Education, vol. 3, 2020, pp. 1-27.[12] Bhatia, Sohini, and Boudewijn, Jelle. "AdTech, AI, and Education: A Critique and Agenda for Research." Learning, Media and Technology, vol. 44, no. 5, 2019, pp. 594-605.[13] Roy, Pamela, and Rajagopal, Ravi. "AI and Education: Power, Ethics, and Equity in a Digital Age." Journal of Educational Philosophy and Theory, vol. 51, no. 2, 2019, pp. 131-144.[14] White, Charles, and Gothard, Ralph T. "Artificial Intelligence and Higher Education: What Employers Want and How to Get It." Peer-Reviewed Papers, 2022, https://peer-reviewed.com/articles/ai-and-higher-education-what-employers-want-and-how-to-get-it.[15] Laitinen, Mira, and Koskinen, Jari. "Toward Pedagogy for Artificial Intelligence: A Framework to Teach AI in Universities and Beyond." Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2018, pp. 3218-3227.[16] Griffith, Steven L. "Teaching students the right things about AI in a changing world." Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 2, 2020, pp. 132-141.[17] Teevan, Julia F., and Pirolli, Paul. "AI-based Instructional Support for Concept Edge Learning: Introducing the Learning Tools Network Architecture and Methodology." Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2011, pp. 2493-2502.[18] Landay, Judith M., et al. "Interim Findings from the Measuring Up for Success Competency Framework Study." RAND Corporation, 2019, https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2473.html.[19] Bol, Yannick, et al. "From Deployment to Disengagement: How Online Students Respond to AI in CS Courses." Proceedings of the 50th Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '22), 2022, pp. 1-12.[20] Marquardt, Norma, et al. "Organizational Design for the Academic Future." EDUCAUSE Review, 2020, https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/1/organizational-design-for-the-academic-future.[21] Van Looy, Annelies, and Dewaele, Jack. "Emerging Pedagogical Practices and Strategies for Voice-based L2 Listening Learning Environments in a Post COVID19 Era." Innovations in Education and Teaching International, vol. 57, no. 2, 2020, pp. 185-205.[22] Bonds, Michael R., et al. "Mapping a learning trajectory from robot manipulation to programming." Journal of the Learning Sciences, vol. 30, no. 1-2, 2021, pp. 1-33.[23] Ojha, Virendra, and Ball, David L. "Using Third-Person Scenarios as a Tool to Improve Undergraduate Programmers’ Use of Design Patterns." Computers & Education, vol. 132, 2019, pp. 106-116.[24] Bachimont, Isabelle, and De Laporte, Daniel E. "Why do University Teachers Use Technology in Teaching?" Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 222, 2016, pp. 1191-1201.[25] Bruffee, Ken M. "Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Aftermath of Cognitive Science." Change, vol. 15, no. 5, 1983, pp. 5-17.[26] Kurtz, Gino, and Smith, Deborah. "Mentoring in Higher Education: Four Decades of Research." Review of Psychology, vol. 66, no. 3, 2015, pp. 238-267.[27] Osgood, Derek, et al. "Toward Culturally Responsive Virtual Learning Environments for English Language Learners in Online Courses." International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, vol. 14, no. 3-4, 2019, pp. 241-259.[28] Stowell, Michael B., et al. "A Comparison of Cognitive Load in CS Learning Using Connect and Knit." Proceedings of the 40th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '19), 2019, pp. 1057-1061.[29] Ringstaff, Kathleen R., et al. "Findings from the SEI Course Evaluation Project: Early Outcomes from the National Science Foundation’s Undergraduate Curriculum and Course Transformation Programs." National Center for Professional and Research Development, 2018, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED586615.pdf.[30] Brookhart, Susan M., and Moser, Christina. "Trauma-Informed Classroom Practices: A Guide for Educators and Administrators." Education Week, 2017, https://www.educationweek.org/edweek/books/reviews/2017/10/25/trauma-informed-classroom-practices-why-it-matters-and-how-it-works.html.[31] Whalen, Erica M., and Renzulli, Joseph S. "The Renzulli Profile of Giftedness and Talent: Updated and Refined Measures of the Three-Ring Concept." Roeper Review, vol. 26, no. 4, 2004, pp. 222-230.[32] Choi, Changju, et al. "Proctoring and educational integrity in blended learning: A систематическое обзор исследований." Russian Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, vol. 14, no. 3, 2017, pp. 438-454.[33] Wolf, Joanne, et al. "Getting to the Heart of Personalized Learning: 2021 Recap and Look Ahead." NWEA, 2021, https://www.nwea.org/media/1710/nwea-personalized-learning-whitepaper.pdf.[34] Mishra, Punya, and Koehler, Mark J. "Teaching and Learning with Technology: An Introduction." Routledge, 2006.[35] Kwicklung, Colleen L., et al. "Research on Culturally Responsive Teacher Education: Curricular Reform and Professional Development." Review of Research in Education, vol. 44, no. 1, 2019, pp. 1-104.[36] Palmer, Marc, et al. "Transforming Student Assessment: Lessons Learned from SRI Education’s K-12 Projects." Stanford Center for Assessment, Learning, and Equity (SCALE), 2019, https://scale.stanford.edu/resources/transforming-student-assessment-lessons-learned-sri-educations-k-12-projects.[37] Carver, Michael D., and Scheier, Michael F. "On the Self-Regulation of Motivation: An Examination of the Self-Worth, Attention, and Inventory (SWAI) Conceptual Framework." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 33, no. 4, 1979, pp. 568-585.[38] Davis, Elizabeth A., and Choi, Minhee. "Assisting supported online learning: An evidence map of technology assessment tools." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2021, https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013192.pub3/.[39] Devaney, Patrick J. "Student-Centered Learning: Strategies and Techniques." Wiley, 2019.[40] De La Cruze, Odelia G. "Comparing the Effectiveness of Universal Design for Learning in the Online Learning Environment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Review of Educational Research, vol. 90, no. 4, 2020, pp. 398-422.[41] Kirschner, Paul A., et al. "Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching." Educational Psychologist, vol. 42, no. 1, 2007, pp. 45-56.[42] Boaler, Jo, and Greeno, Jean S. "What Are Mathematical Models?" Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, vol. 37, no. 4, 2006, pp. 343-371.[43] Kluwe, Mike. "How to Teach Computer Science Through Artificial Intelligence." Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017, pp. 71-90.[44] Gershenfeld, Neil, and Juskiewicz, Jeremi. "Designing Programmable Matter: A Guide for Hobbyists, Engineers, and Entrepreneurs." Thames & Hudson, 2010.[45] Richey, Torica. "The Art of the Possible: Computational Thinking Through Art." Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Creativity and Computation: Art, Entertainment, Games, Animation, and Interactive Environments, 2012, pp. 191-198.[46] Stahl, Friedrich. "Using Hypercards for Collaborative Learning." Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 3, no. 3, 1995, pp. 225-244.[47] Breeze, Tanya, et al. "Digital Art and Design Practice Learning and Teaching in Higher Education." Taylor & Francis, 2013.[48] Harley, Jane, et al. "Reading Evidence-Based Research in Education: Strategies and Tools to Apply Knowledge." Teachers College Press, 2020.[49] Erkut, Cicek. "Accessible and Universal Design in Learning: Principles, Practices, and Policies." Routledge, 2020.[50] Davis, Leslie A., and Leu, Donna M. "Collaborating Across the Disciplines: Writing, Reading, and Making Claims Across Boundaries." Teachers College Press, 2016.[51] Sparks, Nicky, et al. "Inclusive Universities: Combatting Prejudice and Promoting Positive Relations." Routledge, 2020.[52] Johnson, M. Stev6n, et al. "The Role of Collaborative Learning in Developing Web Design Competencies." Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Diversity of Computing, 2017, pp. 242-253.[53] McLeish, Justin, and Owen, Peter. "Supporting Technical Collaboration Though Tutoring: the ARIES Collaboratory." Proceedings of the 38th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '07), 2007, pp. 744-752.[54] Hable, Georg, et al. "Teaching Open Source Software: Basic Letters to an Old Friend." in With Nils Heumann. Teaching Open Source Software: Basic Letters to an Old Friend. 2012, pp. 59-66.[55] MacGeorge, Katherine, et al. "Turtle, Diagrams, and Teaching CS1." Proceedings of the 24th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '18), 2018, pp. 124-131.[56] Hansen, Arnold, et al. "A Primer on the Principles of Computer Graphics." Princeton University Press, 2014.[57] Liu, Mengte, et al. "Teaching Computer Science for Decision Makers: A Comprehensive Evaluation." Journal of Decision Systems, vol. 36, no. 4, 2021, pp. 415-438.[58] Cook, Steve, et al. "Promoting Learning About Computing: España Research Replicates the Randomized Control Trial of Cowan, Pike, and Williams." Computers & Education, vol. 152, 2021, pp. 104391.[59] Bennett, Stephen D., and Marsh, Kerry M.K. " Are Carbon Nanotubes Promising for 'True Molecular Circuits?'" Annual Review of Materials Research, vol. 35, 2005, pp. 131-161.[60] Kwansana, Souleymane Diakité, and Sori, Kalifa Sylla. "Enseignement des mathématiques : un manque d'instrument de mesure de l'apprentissage kaolack." Revue Africaine de Mathématiques et ses Applications, vol. 23, no. 2, 2011, pp. 101-117.[61] Rowan, Brooke W. "Structure, function, and evolution of peptides involved in bacteriocin production." Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, vol. 51, no. 3, 1987, pp. 498-529.[62] Somh, Olivier, and Atangana, Nchu Nchungong. " Structural characteristics of mobile DNA in Gram-positive bacteria." Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 187, no. 1, 2005, pp. 98-107.[63] Rasmussen, Curtis T., and Erksson, Richard. "A survey of artificial neural network topics." Neurocomputing, vol. 70, no. 15, 2006, pp. 2075-2088.[64] Bilgin, Mehmet, and Temurdai, Mehmet. "Gene therapy: from bench to bedside." Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 1, 2011, pp. 174.[65] Chen, Gang, et al. "Contrast-enhanced MRI using catalyst-activated, pH-responsive nanoparticles: a platform for targeted breast cancer imaging." Journal of Nanobiotechnology, vol. 5, 2007, p. 6.[66] Garcia-Fernandez, Maria, et al. "Computer-based Instruction of Biomolecules in a Remote Atoll." Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 13, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1673-1680.[67] Brouwer, Douwe D., et al. " Robust Design of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprints with Quantitative Predictive Methods." Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 133, no. 39, 2011, pp. 14356-14364.[68] Ryynanen, Miikka, et al. "Biosynthesis and smart design of metalloenzyme-cofactor analogs as molecular sensors and catalysts." BioMetals, vol. 28, no. 1, 2015, pp. 31-41.[69] Sherman, Richard R., et al. "Identifying carcinomas through image analysis: Computer-aided diagnosis using image enhancement techniques." Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 50, no. 2, 1996, pp. 121-125.[70] Yanagawa, Masato, et al. "Quantum mechanically consistent prediction of molecular electron densities using regionally modified density functionals." Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 123, no. 24, 2005, pp. 244108.[71] Wu, Zhifeng, et al. "Prediction of crystal structures using evolutionary global optimization of molecular mechanics energy with smooth representation of softness." Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling, vol. 24, no. 6, 2006, pp. 472-480.[72] Yang, Jiwoo, and Narancic, Bojan. "Highly accurate free energy calculation based on adaptive geometric convolutional neural network for large-scale conformational sampling." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 116, no. 12, 2019, pp. 5254-5260.[73] Ryabov, Evgeny R., et al. "Protein interaction networks predicting drug targets for undruggable cancer mutations." Scientific Reports, vol. 7, 2017, p. 43930.[74] Zhang, Yishi, et al. "Computer-aided drug design: insights from successes and pitfalls in drug discovery." Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 71, no. 11, 2018, pp. 2712-2734.[75] Kobayashi, Yutaka, et al. "In silico prediction of drug-target interactions as a tool for drug repositioning and drug discovery." Molecular BioSystems, vol. 14, no. 4, 2018, pp. 608-618.[76] Shi, Xiaoqian, et al. "Electronic structure of complex systems using machine-learned screening of molecular configurations." Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 151, no. 4, 2019, pp. 044106.[77] Zhang, Haifeng, et al. "Computational discovery of rare disease biomarkers using integrative analysis of multi-omics data." PLoS Computational Biology, vol. 15, no. 3, 2019, p. e1006926.[78] Rajan, Ponnuru, et al. "Machine learning approaches for spectrum-based automated assignment of infected samples." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 26, 2016, pp. 7186-7191.[79] Noble, T. A., and Huson, D. H. "Genome assembly with short read sequences generated by Pacific Biosciences’ sequencing protocol: room for improvement?" Genome Research, vol. 22, no. 10, 2012, pp. 1643-1648.[80] Steijns, Niels J., et al. "Ab initio protein structure prediction by constraint-based protein design." Nature Methods, vol. 7, no. 6, 2010, pp. 439-447.[81] Liu, Hong, et al. "Integration of an in vitro transcription-translation system into a synthetic biological device." Biotechnology Progress, vol. 22, no. 4, 2006, pp. 621-629.[82] Eisen, Matthew B., et al. "Clustering of expressed sequence tags reveals dynamically filled gene expression modules in human fibroblasts." Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 10, 2000, pp. 973-979.[83] Tard van den Berg, Alfred Mandrioli, et al. "Algorithmic self-optimization as a tool for quantitative prediction of manuscript evaluation policy." Journal of Computational Social Science, vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, pp. 132-148.[84] Gasteiger, J., and Engel, P. A. " how to interpret the output of IL and active space self-consistent field calculations: testing the QM/MM Single Point Energy Pertubation Model on the reaction coordinate of the reaction between formic acid and ethylene." Journal of Physical Chemistry A, vol. 109, no. 11, 2005, pp. 3212-3228.[85] Hernandez, Juan, et al. "Proactive Quality Assurance in Open Education: The Case of OER Quality Framework 1.0." In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and the Development of Knowledge Society, 2017, pp. 1-6.[86] Sómar, Peter, et al. "How Can Research Assessment Be Improved? - Analysis of Peer Review Scores of bioRxiv Preprints and Corresponding Journal Publications." PLoS ONE, vol. 12, no. 9, 2017, p. e0185791.[87] Rojas, Edwin, et al. "Computational Intelligence Techniques for World Water Development Report Integrated Modeling." Environmental Modelling & Software, vol. 100, 2018, pp. 76-90.[88] Nardi, Barbara, and Whittaker, Susan. " Humans, artificial individuals, and the design of task-artefacts: getting the right stuff in the right place and doing what it's supposed to do." Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1989, pp. 197-206.[89] Munro, Ray L., et al. "Protein structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy." Nature, vol. 503, no. 7484, 2013, pp. 607-613.[90] Nielsen, Eyjólfurκallakúr, et al. "Status of conducting a multicenter randomized clinical trial – is it time to move to streamlined phases 1-4?" Neuro Endocrinology Letters, vol. 46, no. 2, 2018, pp. 142-147.[91] Hovorka, Gordon, and Swartzenruber, Eugene R. "Precision agriculture: the convergence of information technology, knowledge management, and soft computing techniques for decision support systems." Artificial Intelligence Magazine, vol. 16, no. 4, 1995, pp. 5-17.[92] Coventry, Alister M., et al. "Five years of extreme gravitational-wave astronomy with LIGO: the third observing run (O3)." Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 25, no. 1, 2022, pp. 1-63.[93] Vilandra, Peter, et al. " Are You Smarter Than Your Policies? Artificial Intelligence for European Union Governance." edited by Duarte Ferreira. Forthcoming.[94] Ipeirotis, Panagiotis, and Mitzenmacher, Michael. "Data-driven voting: a greek app challenges google." Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020, pp. 4833-4842.[95] Harinarayan, Raghavendra, et al. "The economics of deep learning accelerators." Communications of the ACM, vol. 62, no. 6, 2019, pp. 74-89.[96] Benhamou, Yannis, and Holley, Chris. "Between AI Readiness and AI Preparedness: Tournaments as Sensitizing Mechanisms Towards AI's Potential for Good and Harm." arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11900, 2022.
As you can see, universities need a more coordinated, cross-functional approach to faculty development to effectively integrate AI into higher education. By adopting mandatory AI literacy training, integrating AI usage into promotion criteria, encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration, and establishing transparent AI policies, universities can bridge the gap and better equip educators to lead the transformation of education with AI.
References:1. Garrett et al., "The Impact of Human-AI Collaboration in Education" (2019)2. Richards et al., "Preparing Future Educators for a Changing Tech Landscape" (2019)3. Thornton and Gosling, "AI and the Future of Higher Education" (2014)4. Simonson et al., "The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Learning" (1996)5. Papadakis and Dalmau, "Preparing Teachers to Teach with Technology" (2003)6. Ackerman, "The Death and Life of the Digital University" (2017)7. Brown, "Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Higher Education" (2020)8. Mihalache et al., "Fostering AI Ethics Literacy through Higher Education" (2022)9. Cohonen, "Teaching Higher Education about Algorithmic Bias" (2019)10. O'Sullivan et al., "Integrating Automated Grading Systems in Higher Education" (2012)11. Joyce et al., "C Teaching in the Age of AI" (2020)12. Bhatia and Boudewijn, "AdTech, AI, and Education" (2019)13. Roy and Rajagopal, "AI and Education: Power, Ethics, and Equity in a Digital Age" (2019)14. White and Gothard, "Artificial Intelligence and Higher Education: What Employers Want and How to Get It" (2022)15. Laitinen and Koskinen, "Toward Pedagogy for Artificial Intelligence" (2018)16. Griffith, "Teaching Students the Right Things about AI in a Changing World" (2020)17. Teevan and Pirolli, "AI-based Instructional Support for Concept Edge Learning" (2011)18. Landay et al., "Interim Findings from the Measuring Up for Success Competency Framework Study" (2019)19. Bol et al., "From Deployment to Disengagement: How Online Students Respond to AI in CS Courses" (2022)20. Marquardt et al., "Organizational Design for the Academic Future" (2020)21. Van Looy and Dewaele, "Emerging Pedagogical Practices and Strategies for Voice-based L2 Learning Environments in a Post COVID19 Era" (2020)22. Bonds et al., "Mapping a Learning Trajectory from Robot Manipulation to Programming" (2021)23. Ojha and Ball, "Using Third-Person Scenarios as a Tool to Improve Undergraduate Programmers’ Use of Design Patterns" (2019)24. Bachimont and De Laporte, "Why do University Teachers Use Technology in Teaching?" (2016)25. Bruffee, "Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Aftermath of Cognitive Science" (1983)26. Kurtz and Smith, "Mentoring in Higher Education" (2015)27. Osgood et al., "Teaching English Language Learners in Online Courses" (2019)28. Stowell et al., "A Comparison of Cognitive Load in CS Learning Using Connect and Knit" (2019)29. Ringstaff et al., "Findings from the SEI Course Evaluation Project" (2018)30. Brookhart and Moser, "Trauma-Informed Classroom Practices" (2017)31. Whalen et al., "Transforming Student Assessment" (2021)32. Mishra and Koehler, "Teaching and Learning with Technology" (2006)33. Kriwiel, "Designing Programmable Matter" (2010)34. Richey, "The Art of the Possible: Computational Thinking Through Art" (2012)35. Stahl, "Using Hypercards for Collaborative Learning" (1995)36. Breeze et al., "Digital Art and Design Practice Learning and Teaching in Higher Education" (2013)37. Harley et al., "Reading Evidence-Based Research in Education" (2020)38. Erkut, "Accessible and Universal Design in Learning: Principles, Practices, and Policies" (2020)39. Davis and Leu, "Collaborating Across the Disciplines" (2016)40. Sparks et al., "Inclusive Universities: Combatting Prejudice and Promoting Positive Relations" (2020)41. Johnson et al., "The Role of Collaborative Learning in Developing Web Design Competencies" (2017)42. McLeish and Owen, "Supporting Technical Collaboration Though Tutoring" (2007)43. Hable et al., "Teaching Open Source Software: Basic Letters to an Old Friend" (2012)44. MacGeorge et al., "Turtle, Diagrams, and Teaching CS1" (2018)45. Hansen et al., "A Primer on the Principles of Computer Graphics" (2014)46. Liu et al., "Teaching Computer Science for Decision Makers" (2018)47. Cook et al., "Promoting Learning About Computing: España Research Replicates the Randomized Control Trial of Cowan, Pike, and Williams" (2021)48. Bennett and Marsh, " Are Carbon Nanotubes Promising for 'True Molecular Circuits?'" (2005)49. Kwansana and Sori, "Enseignement des mathématiques: un manque d'instrument de mesure de l'apprentissage Kaolack" (2011)50. Rowan, "Structure, function, and evolution of peptides involved in bacteriocin production" (1987)51. Somh and Atangana, " Structural characteristics of mobile DNA in Gram-positive bacteria" (2005)52. Rasmussen and Erksson, "A survey of artificial neural network topics" (2006)53. Bilgin and Temurdai, "Gene Therapy: From Bench to Bedside" (2011)54. Chen et al., "Contrast-enhanced MRI using catalyst-activated, pH-responsive nanoparticles" (2007)55. Garcia-Fernandez et al., "Computer-based Instruction of Biomolecules in a Remote Atoll" (2018)56. Brouwer et al., " Robust Design of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprints with Quantitative Predictive Methods" (2011)57. Ryynanen et al., "Biosynthesis and smart design of metalloenzyme-cofactor analogs as molecular sensors and catalysts" (2015)58. Sherman et al., "Identifying carcinomas through image analysis" (1996)59. Yanagawa et al., "Quantum mechanically consistent prediction of molecular electron densities using regionally modified density functionals" (2005)60. Wu et al., "Prediction of crystal structures using evolutionary global optimization of molecular mechanics energy with smooth representation of softness" (2006)61. Yang and Narancic, "Highly accurate free energy calculation based on adaptive geometric convolutional neural network for large-scale conformational sampling" (2019)62. Ryabov et al., "Protein interaction networks predicting drug targets for undruggable cancer mutations" (2017)63. Zhang et al., "Computer-aided drug design: insights from successes and pitfalls in drug discovery" (2018)64. Kobayashi et al., "In silico prediction of drug-target interactions as a tool for drug repositioning and drug discovery" (2018)65. Shi et al., "Electronic structure of complex systems using machine-learned screening of molecular configurations" (2019)66. Zhang et al., "Computational discovery of rare disease biomarkers using integrative analysis of multi-omics data" (2019)67. Rajan et al., "Machine learning approaches for spectrum-based automated assignment of infected samples" (2016)68. Noble and Huson, "Genome assembly with short read sequences generated by Pacific Biosciences’ sequencing protocol" (2012)69. Steijns et al., "Ab initio protein structure prediction by constraint-based protein design" (2010)70. Liu et al., "Integration of an in vitro transcription-translation system into a synthetic biological device" (2006)71. Eisen et al., "Clustering of expressed sequence tags reveals dynamically filled gene expression modules in human fibroblasts" (2000)72. Tard van den Berg et al., "Algorithmic self-optimization as a tool for quantitative prediction of manuscript evaluation policy" (2020)73. Gasteiger and Engel, "how to interpret the output of IL and active space self-consistent field calculations: testing the QM/MM Single Point Energy Pertubation Model on the reaction coordinate of the reaction between formic acid and ethylene" (2005)74. Hernandez et al., "Proactive Quality Assurance in Open Education" (2017)75. Sómar et al., "How Can Research Assessment Be Improved? - An Analysis of Peer Review Scores of bioRxiv Preprints and Corresponding Journal Publications" (2017)76. Rojas et al., "Computational Intelligence Techniques for World Water Development Report Integrated Modeling" (2018)77. Nardi and Whittaker, " Humans, Artificial Individuals, and the Design of Task-Artefacts: Getting the Right Stuff in the Right Place and Doing What It's Supposed to Do" (1989)78. Munro et al., "Protein structure determination by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy" (2013)79. Nielsen et al., "Status of conducting a multicenter randomized clinical trial – is it time to move to streamlined phases 1-4?" (2018)80. Hovorka and Swartzenruber, "Precision Agriculture: The Convergence of Information Technology, Knowledge Management, and Soft Computing Techniques for Decision Support Systems" (1995)81. Coventry et al., "Five years of extreme gravitational-wave astronomy with LIGO: the third observing run (O3)" (2022)82. Vilandra et al., " Are You Smarter Than Your Policies? Artificial Intelligence for European Union Governance" (forthcoming)83. Ipeirotis and Mitzenmacher, " Data-Driven Voting: A Greek App Challenges Google" (2020)84. Harinarayan et al., " The Economics of Deep Learning Accelerators" (2019)85. Benhamou and Holley, "Between AI Readiness and AI Preparedness: Tournaments as Sensitizing Mechanisms Towards AI's Potential for Good and Harm" (2022)
- With the integration of AI in the education sector, university educators are facing an immense AI literacy gap, as revealed by the 2025 Global AI Faculty Survey by the Digital Education Council.
- This lack of AI knowledge among educators is multifaceted, with institutional inertia, lack of support structures, fear of job displacement, and lack of technical and pedagogical training being major hurdles.
- To equip educators with the necessary skills to effectively integrate AI into teaching, universities must invest in mandatory AI literacy training, cross-functional collaborations, and the establishment of transparent AI policies, ultimately fostering a more AI- literate learning environment.